LDecember 11, 2025 at 12:46 PM UTCInsurance

Delaware Supreme Court Rules Against Loews in Boardwalk Litigation, Adding Legal Overhang

Read source article

What happened

The Delaware Supreme Court has found that Loews breached a partnership agreement in its 2018 acquisition of minority interests in Boardwalk Pipelines, a key subsidiary contributing stable cash flows. This ruling stems from litigation that could impact Loews' financials, as Boardwalk is central to its diversified portfolio but already faces regulatory and execution risks. The court remanded the issue of tortious interference back to the Chancery Court, leaving potential liability unresolved and creating uncertainty. DeepValue's analysis highlights Loews' reliance on Boardwalk's fee-based revenues and aggressive buybacks funded by parent cash, making this legal setback a new headwind. Investors must now weigh the risk of financial penalties or diverted capital against the company's otherwise solid earnings growth and capital return cadence.

Implication

In the near term, the unresolved tortious interference issue creates a legal overhang, potentially dampening investor sentiment and stock performance. Financially, any eventual liability or settlement could reduce Loews' $3.6 billion parent cash pool, which funds its aggressive share repurchases and dividend capacity. Operationally, the litigation may distract management or lead to increased governance scrutiny at Boardwalk, complicating its $3 billion growth project execution. Given the DeepValue report's emphasis on Boardwalk's regulatory risks, this development amplifies concerns about subsidiary stability and cash flow durability. Long-term, if the litigation results in substantial costs, it could undermine the thesis of steady per-share compounding through disciplined capital allocation.

Thesis delta

The investment thesis now incorporates heightened legal and financial risk from the Boardwalk litigation, which could impair capital allocation and subsidiary dividends. However, the core drivers—CNA's underwriting discipline and parent-level buybacks—remain intact, but with added caution that necessitates monitoring for potential liability impacts.

Confidence

High